Warhammer Age Of Sigmar: Flesh-eater Courts - Grand Justice Gormayne

Games Workshop

£22.45 £25.00 Save £2.55

Tax includedShipping calculated at checkout

 More payment options

Pickup currently unavailable at Gathering Games Skipton

Recommended Paint

Grand Justice Gormayne is the highest magistrate in all of Ushoran's ghoul kingdoms. He ensures that the Carrion King’s laws and edicts are followed – no matter how insane they may be – and those who transgress are punished with grisly fates. A cunning orator, Gormayne spurs his ghoulish ‘juries’ into a frothing rage, condemning foes to be bloodily torn apart.

This multipart plastic kit builds Grand Justice Gormayne, a horrifying vampiric arbiter of the Flesh-eater Courts. Swinging a gore-streaked gavel fashioned from well-gnawed bones, the Grand Justice calls for order and cracks unruly skulls. He pronounces judgement on Ushoran's enemies whilst dressed in what he believes to be the finest robes and wig of office, reading ancient laws from a ragged 'legal tome'.

This kit contains 10 plastic components and comes with a Citadel 32mm Round Base. This miniature is supplied unpainted and requires assembly – we recommend using Citadel Plastic Glue and Citadel Colour paints.

Games Workshop have two broad methods for painting their models. Both are entirely viable options, though have significant differences in the paints required (detailed below). You can find all of the required paints in the 'recommended paint' section below, whether you simply want to get it out onto the tabletop ASAP (i.e. 'Battle Ready'), or want to take your time and make it a masterpiece (i.e. 'Parade Ready'):

1. Classic Method - uses acrylic paints to build layers of colour and depth. Usually topped off with a shade paint to really make the shadows pop. Probably the most beginner friendly method as mistakes are often easy to fix.

2. Contast Method - uses ink-like contrast painsts which sink into recesses, providing depth in highlights and shadows with a single layer of paint. It can take some practise to get this method to look great, but it's highly satisfying when it does work. Less forgiving when mistakes happen, though arguably the quicker method of the two options.

New content loaded