Warhammer Age Of Sigmar: Flesh-eater Courts - Royal Decapitator

Games Workshop

£19.99 £22.50 Save £2.51

Tax includedShipping calculated at checkout

 More payment options

Pickup currently unavailable at Gathering Games Skipton

Recommended Paint

Royal Decapitators are the unholy executioners of the Flesh-eater Courts, viewed with unease even by fellow ghouls – more than hunger or duty, they care only for the dealing of death. Dragging huge, tarnished axes behind them, the Royal Decapitators serve their lieges as gibbering executioners, and delight in taking worthy heads.

This multipart plastic kit builds a Royal Decapitator, a ghoulish headsman who serves the royalty of the Flesh-eater Courts. The Decapitator cleaves through the necks of the mightiest opponents with a massive, rusted axe, driving ghouls around them into a frenzy of slaughter. This kit offers a choice of two different heads – one strung with bone trinkets, the other masked by a grim executioner's hood.

This kit contains nine plastic components and a Citadel 32mm Round Base. This miniature is supplied unpainted and requires assembly – we recommend using Citadel Plastic Glue and Citadel Colour paints.

Games Workshop have two broad methods for painting their models. Both are entirely viable options, though have significant differences in the paints required (detailed below). You can find all of the required paints in the 'recommended paint' section below, whether you simply want to get it out onto the tabletop ASAP (i.e. 'Battle Ready'), or want to take your time and make it a masterpiece (i.e. 'Parade Ready'):

1. Classic Method - uses acrylic paints to build layers of colour and depth. Usually topped off with a shade paint to really make the shadows pop. Probably the most beginner friendly method as mistakes are often easy to fix.

2. Contast Method - uses ink-like contrast painsts which sink into recesses, providing depth in highlights and shadows with a single layer of paint. It can take some practise to get this method to look great, but it's highly satisfying when it does work. Less forgiving when mistakes happen, though arguably the quicker method of the two options.

New content loaded